<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1802 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305143</link>
    <description>After completion of investigation and filing of the charge sheet in a narcotic offence under the NDPS Act, the Court found no further impediment to enlarge the accused on bail. Bail was granted subject to conditions designed to secure his appearance before the Court and prevent further alleged misconduct. The operative principle stated is that, once investigation is complete and the charge sheet has been filed, bail may be allowed if no additional bar is shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:28:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1802 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305143</link>
      <description>After completion of investigation and filing of the charge sheet in a narcotic offence under the NDPS Act, the Court found no further impediment to enlarge the accused on bail. Bail was granted subject to conditions designed to secure his appearance before the Court and prevent further alleged misconduct. The operative principle stated is that, once investigation is complete and the charge sheet has been filed, bail may be allowed if no additional bar is shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>