https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305134 In preventive detention under the National Security Act, 1980, the grounds were held sufficiently particular because they disclosed the basic facts needed for an effective representation and supported the detaining authority's satisfaction; antecedent conduct and two incidents showing a continuing tendency to incite communal violence could be relied on, and the detention challenge for vagueness, staleness, and lack of nexus failed. The Court also found no unexplained or undue delay in processing the detenue's representation, as it moved promptly through the administrative levels despite intervening non-working days, so the continued detention was not vitiated. The detention order was upheld. en-us Tue, 01 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:08:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305134 In preventive detention under the National Security Act, 1980, the grounds were held sufficiently particular because they disclosed the basic facts needed for an effective representation and supported the detaining authority's satisfaction; antecedent conduct and two incidents showing a continuing tendency to incite communal violence could be relied on, and the detention challenge for vagueness, staleness, and lack of nexus failed. The Court also found no unexplained or undue delay in processing the detenue's representation, as it moved promptly through the administrative levels despite intervening non-working days, so the continued detention was not vitiated. The detention order was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305134