<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 831 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430407</link>
    <description>Preparatory activity undertaken for tendering or obtaining a contract does not count towards the twelve-month threshold for a building, construction, assembly or installation project permanent establishment under Article 5(2)(g) of the India-Cyprus Treaty. The relevant period begins only when business activities at the site actually commence, and travel or other auxiliary steps taken before execution of the contract are excluded. On the facts, site work was found to have started only on or after 4 January 2008, with no perversity in the Tribunal&#039;s findings on the project dates. No permanent establishment was established, and the contract receipts were not taxable in India under Article 7.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 831 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430407</link>
      <description>Preparatory activity undertaken for tendering or obtaining a contract does not count towards the twelve-month threshold for a building, construction, assembly or installation project permanent establishment under Article 5(2)(g) of the India-Cyprus Treaty. The relevant period begins only when business activities at the site actually commence, and travel or other auxiliary steps taken before execution of the contract are excluded. On the facts, site work was found to have started only on or after 4 January 2008, with no perversity in the Tribunal&#039;s findings on the project dates. No permanent establishment was established, and the contract receipts were not taxable in India under Article 7.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>