https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30966 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellants. The case revolved around the usage of the brand name 'Double Horse' on products, with the Tribunal finding merit in the appellants' argument supported by Circulars from M/s. Manjilas Rice Mills. The demand for duty was limited to a specific period as per the Circulars, leading to the overturning of the penalty. The appellants were directed to pay the recomputed amount promptly, with the judgment issued on 24.03.2008 by the Tribunal. en-us Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30966 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellants. The case revolved around the usage of the brand name 'Double Horse' on products, with the Tribunal finding merit in the appellants' argument supported by Circulars from M/s. Manjilas Rice Mills. The demand for duty was limited to a specific period as per the Circulars, leading to the overturning of the penalty. The appellants were directed to pay the recomputed amount promptly, with the judgment issued on 24.03.2008 by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30966