<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 830 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430406</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing that the petitioners should utilize the statutory remedy available under the Income Tax Act, 1961, rather than seeking relief through Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court clarified that it did not assess the challenged assessment orders on their merits, directing the parties to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 830 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430406</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions, emphasizing that the petitioners should utilize the statutory remedy available under the Income Tax Act, 1961, rather than seeking relief through Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court clarified that it did not assess the challenged assessment orders on their merits, directing the parties to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>