<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 813 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430389</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessments under section 147 was invalid due to the absence of fresh material, ruling in favor of the assessee. Regarding deductions under section 80P(2)(d), the Tribunal directed the AO to allow deductions based on the presumption that investments were made from the assessee&#039;s own funds. The appeals were decided in favor of the assessee for AY 2011-12 and 2012-13, with partial relief granted for AY 2014-15.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 813 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430389</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessments under section 147 was invalid due to the absence of fresh material, ruling in favor of the assessee. Regarding deductions under section 80P(2)(d), the Tribunal directed the AO to allow deductions based on the presumption that investments were made from the assessee&#039;s own funds. The appeals were decided in favor of the assessee for AY 2011-12 and 2012-13, with partial relief granted for AY 2014-15.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>