<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 802 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430378</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to an appealable fiscal adjudication order will ordinarily not be entertained where the statutory appellate remedy has been allowed to lapse by delay and no satisfactory explanation is offered. The petitioner approached the High Court under Article 226 without filing the appeal within the prescribed time, and the delay was left unexplained. In these facts, the Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction and rejected the petition as not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 802 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430378</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to an appealable fiscal adjudication order will ordinarily not be entertained where the statutory appellate remedy has been allowed to lapse by delay and no satisfactory explanation is offered. The petitioner approached the High Court under Article 226 without filing the appeal within the prescribed time, and the delay was left unexplained. In these facts, the Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction and rejected the petition as not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>