https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30962 The appeal challenging the confiscation of goods with an option of redemption fine and penalty imposition was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellant's argument of lack of mens rea for clandestine removal due to a mix-up of goods was rejected. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, emphasizing the discrepancies in stock verification and the RG-I Register as indicative of intent for clandestine removal. The Tribunal found the Revenue's submissions well-founded, dismissing the appellant's objections and citing the absence of legal errors in the impugned order as reasons for the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30962 The appeal challenging the confiscation of goods with an option of redemption fine and penalty imposition was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellant's argument of lack of mens rea for clandestine removal due to a mix-up of goods was rejected. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, emphasizing the discrepancies in stock verification and the RG-I Register as indicative of intent for clandestine removal. The Tribunal found the Revenue's submissions well-founded, dismissing the appellant's objections and citing the absence of legal errors in the impugned order as reasons for the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30962