<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal Success: Commissioner (Appeals) Confirms Appellant&#039;s Right to Credit in Electronic Ledger; Refund Should Be Granted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66615</link>
    <description>Refund of pre-deposit made under Section 35F by way of reversal in GST-ITC credit - Since the Commissioner (Appeals) has agreed that the appellant is eligible to avail the credit in their electronic credit ledger the appeal should not have been rejected, whereas the refund should have been allowed if not in cash, but atleast by way of credit in their electronic credit ledger - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:33:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:33:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal Success: Commissioner (Appeals) Confirms Appellant&#039;s Right to Credit in Electronic Ledger; Refund Should Be Granted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66615</link>
      <description>Refund of pre-deposit made under Section 35F by way of reversal in GST-ITC credit - Since the Commissioner (Appeals) has agreed that the appellant is eligible to avail the credit in their electronic credit ledger the appeal should not have been rejected, whereas the refund should have been allowed if not in cash, but atleast by way of credit in their electronic credit ledger - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:33:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>