<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 237 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Customs House Agent for allowing their license to be used for monetary consideration, as it did not contravene any specific provisions of the Customs Act. The Tribunal found that the penalty under Section 117 was unsustainable in this case and allowed the appeal, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 237 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the Customs House Agent for allowing their license to be used for monetary consideration, as it did not contravene any specific provisions of the Customs Act. The Tribunal found that the penalty under Section 117 was unsustainable in this case and allowed the appeal, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>