<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (9) TMI 195 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305130</link>
    <description>Concurrent findings of guilt were not disturbed because the private defence story was speculative and inconsistent with the surrounding evidence. The eyewitness version was accepted as reliable, and the blood stains in the courtyard and kotha, together with medical evidence showing distinct groups of stab injuries matching use of more than one weapon, corroborated the prosecution case. The pleas of alibi and absence of motive also failed because the alibi evidence was vague and unreliable, the record did not discredit the prosecution, and the evidence indicated a possible grudge. Hiding from the police was treated as absconding in law, and no benefit of doubt was warranted. The convictions and modified sentences were maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:25:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (9) TMI 195 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305130</link>
      <description>Concurrent findings of guilt were not disturbed because the private defence story was speculative and inconsistent with the surrounding evidence. The eyewitness version was accepted as reliable, and the blood stains in the courtyard and kotha, together with medical evidence showing distinct groups of stab injuries matching use of more than one weapon, corroborated the prosecution case. The pleas of alibi and absence of motive also failed because the alibi evidence was vague and unreliable, the record did not discredit the prosecution, and the evidence indicated a possible grudge. Hiding from the police was treated as absconding in law, and no benefit of doubt was warranted. The convictions and modified sentences were maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>