<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 906 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305117</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety. The additions on account of discrepancies in bank account credits, brokers&#039; accounts, and non-deduction of TDS were found unsustainable due to lack of proper opportunity and violation of natural justice principles. Additionally, the disallowance under section 14A was deemed inapplicable as the assessee had only invested in share application money.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 21:50:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 906 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305117</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety. The additions on account of discrepancies in bank account credits, brokers&#039; accounts, and non-deduction of TDS were found unsustainable due to lack of proper opportunity and violation of natural justice principles. Additionally, the disallowance under section 14A was deemed inapplicable as the assessee had only invested in share application money.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>