<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1470 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305126</link>
    <description>The High Court found the writ petition challenging the Assessment Order and Demand Notice premature and not maintainable as alternative remedies under Sections 246-A, 254, and 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were available. The court granted the petitioner three weeks to appeal before the appropriate authorities, emphasizing a decision on the appeal&#039;s merits in accordance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of with these observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1470 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305126</link>
      <description>The High Court found the writ petition challenging the Assessment Order and Demand Notice premature and not maintainable as alternative remedies under Sections 246-A, 254, and 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were available. The court granted the petitioner three weeks to appeal before the appropriate authorities, emphasizing a decision on the appeal&#039;s merits in accordance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of with these observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>