https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305110 A Central teacher-education statute occupied the field, so the State Government could not use executive or policy power to insist on a no objection certificate for establishing new institutions. Clauses 5(e) and 5(f) of the Regulations were held ultra vires because they imposed a substantive State-government veto that went beyond the rule-making power to regulate applications and conditions for recognition. As the State policy and the no objection certificate requirement were invalid, refusal of recognition based solely on that absence was vitiated and had to be reconsidered on merits without treating the certificate as a condition precedent. en-us Mon, 22 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2022 16:20:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305110 A Central teacher-education statute occupied the field, so the State Government could not use executive or policy power to insist on a no objection certificate for establishing new institutions. Clauses 5(e) and 5(f) of the Regulations were held ultra vires because they imposed a substantive State-government veto that went beyond the rule-making power to regulate applications and conditions for recognition. As the State policy and the no objection certificate requirement were invalid, refusal of recognition based solely on that absence was vitiated and had to be reconsidered on merits without treating the certificate as a condition precedent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305110