<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TIME LIMIT TO REFER STATEMENT OF A CASE BY ‘CESTAT’ TO HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 130(4) OF THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10817</link>
    <description>The issue is whether the 120 day period in Section 130A(4) for the Tribunal to draw up and refer a statement of case to the High Court is mandatory or directory. The Bombay High Court construed the period as directory, stressing that treating it as mandatory could deprive a party of the statutory right to have a question of law considered when delay results from Tribunal inaction beyond the party&#039;s control. The court directed the Tribunal to file the statement and required the Department to provide outstanding papers, preserving the party&#039;s right to seek return or substitution of security if undue delay continues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:14:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:14:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>TIME LIMIT TO REFER STATEMENT OF A CASE BY ‘CESTAT’ TO HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 130(4) OF THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10817</link>
      <description>The issue is whether the 120 day period in Section 130A(4) for the Tribunal to draw up and refer a statement of case to the High Court is mandatory or directory. The Bombay High Court construed the period as directory, stressing that treating it as mandatory could deprive a party of the statutory right to have a question of law considered when delay results from Tribunal inaction beyond the party&#039;s control. The court directed the Tribunal to file the statement and required the Department to provide outstanding papers, preserving the party&#039;s right to seek return or substitution of security if undue delay continues.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:14:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>