<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 786 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430362</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging tax penalty under Section 129 of Tamil Nadu GST Act. Court directed release of seized goods upon payment of 100% tax, with option to appeal. The order acknowledged procedural delays in penalty proceedings and provided a balanced resolution, allowing the company to recover its consignment while preserving its right to challenge the underlying tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 786 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430362</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging tax penalty under Section 129 of Tamil Nadu GST Act. Court directed release of seized goods upon payment of 100% tax, with option to appeal. The order acknowledged procedural delays in penalty proceedings and provided a balanced resolution, allowing the company to recover its consignment while preserving its right to challenge the underlying tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>