https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30954 The High Court allowed the writ petition, remanding the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh orders, as the petitioner's ROM application was filed within time and the Tribunal's calculation of the limitation period was deemed incorrect. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in including the pendency of the ROM application in the limitation period calculation, contrary to legal principles. The order was not quashed, and no costs were awarded, emphasizing the need to uphold the petitioner's rights in accordance with the law. en-us Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Apr 2013 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30954 The High Court allowed the writ petition, remanding the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh orders, as the petitioner's ROM application was filed within time and the Tribunal's calculation of the limitation period was deemed incorrect. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in including the pendency of the ROM application in the limitation period calculation, contrary to legal principles. The order was not quashed, and no costs were awarded, emphasizing the need to uphold the petitioner's rights in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30954