<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 771 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that the levy of late-fee under section 234E before 01.06.2015 was illegal. The rejection of rectification applications under section 154 was deemed unjustified, and the appeals against the rectification orders were upheld. The amendment to section 200A(1) from 01.06.2015 was held not to have retrospective effect. The Tribunal instructed the AO to rectify the intimations and remove the late-fee charged. The assessees&#039; appeals were successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 771 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that the levy of late-fee under section 234E before 01.06.2015 was illegal. The rejection of rectification applications under section 154 was deemed unjustified, and the appeals against the rectification orders were upheld. The amendment to section 200A(1) from 01.06.2015 was held not to have retrospective effect. The Tribunal instructed the AO to rectify the intimations and remove the late-fee charged. The assessees&#039; appeals were successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>