<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 761 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430337</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s appeal seeking restoration of the company&#039;s name in the Register of Companies. The appellant&#039;s argument of unintentional oversight in filing financial statements was rejected, and the Registrar&#039;s power to strike off a company&#039;s name under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 was affirmed. The Tribunal found the company non-operational with no significant financial activity, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and directing the Registry to publish the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:12:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 761 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430337</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s appeal seeking restoration of the company&#039;s name in the Register of Companies. The appellant&#039;s argument of unintentional oversight in filing financial statements was rejected, and the Registrar&#039;s power to strike off a company&#039;s name under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 was affirmed. The Tribunal found the company non-operational with no significant financial activity, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and directing the Registry to publish the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>