<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 751 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of an exporter of services, directing the refund of Rs. 18,76,999 claimed under Cenvat Credit Rules. The rejection of the refund was deemed unjust as the appellant&#039;s ledger debit post-GST implementation was considered compliant with Notification requirements. The Tribunal acknowledged the challenges of transitioning to GST, emphasizing fair treatment in refund cases and ordering the refund with interest within 60 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:11:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 751 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of an exporter of services, directing the refund of Rs. 18,76,999 claimed under Cenvat Credit Rules. The rejection of the refund was deemed unjust as the appellant&#039;s ledger debit post-GST implementation was considered compliant with Notification requirements. The Tribunal acknowledged the challenges of transitioning to GST, emphasizing fair treatment in refund cases and ordering the refund with interest within 60 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>