<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1224 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the revenue and the assessee, upholding some additions while deleting others based on the evidence and explanations provided. The decision emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with adequate evidence and the role of remand proceedings in verifying such claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 21:46:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1224 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the revenue and the assessee, upholding some additions while deleting others based on the evidence and explanations provided. The decision emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with adequate evidence and the role of remand proceedings in verifying such claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>