https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30946 The appeal was filed against a demand for service tax under the category of Consulting Engineer for receiving technical know-how for manufacturing automobile components. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating that the transfer of technical know-how for a lump sum payment does not amount to Consulting Engineer Service. It was also clarified that Indian recipients were not liable to pay tax on services received from abroad before a specific date. The impugned order was vacated, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30946 The appeal was filed against a demand for service tax under the category of Consulting Engineer for receiving technical know-how for manufacturing automobile components. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, stating that the transfer of technical know-how for a lump sum payment does not amount to Consulting Engineer Service. It was also clarified that Indian recipients were not liable to pay tax on services received from abroad before a specific date. The impugned order was vacated, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30946