<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 744 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305096</link>
    <description>An application to send a promissory note for expert examination to determine the age of ink may be refused where it is unlikely to assist in resolving the dispute and would only create confusion. In a money suit based on a negotiable instrument, the court noted that the plaintiff bears the burden of proving execution of the promissory note, and the defendant is not required to seek forensic testing to disprove the claim. The request was also viewed unfavourably because the same relief had earlier been sought and withdrawn without liberty to renew it. The trial court&#039;s order permitting examination was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:29:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 744 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305096</link>
      <description>An application to send a promissory note for expert examination to determine the age of ink may be refused where it is unlikely to assist in resolving the dispute and would only create confusion. In a money suit based on a negotiable instrument, the court noted that the plaintiff bears the burden of proving execution of the promissory note, and the defendant is not required to seek forensic testing to disprove the claim. The request was also viewed unfavourably because the same relief had earlier been sought and withdrawn without liberty to renew it. The trial court&#039;s order permitting examination was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>