https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430316 The court directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 5,00,000 before a specified date and ordered the vehicle not to be used until then, maintaining the status quo. In response to the deposit condition, the court modified it, requiring the petitioner to furnish a bond of Rs. 5,00,000 instead of making a cash deposit. Other directions were to remain in effect, and the respondents were instructed to file a reply before the next hearing date scheduled for 17.11.2022. en-us Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430316 The court directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 5,00,000 before a specified date and ordered the vehicle not to be used until then, maintaining the status quo. In response to the deposit condition, the court modified it, requiring the petitioner to furnish a bond of Rs. 5,00,000 instead of making a cash deposit. Other directions were to remain in effect, and the respondents were instructed to file a reply before the next hearing date scheduled for 17.11.2022. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430316