<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 735 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430311</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act for non-compliance with Section 44AB. The Court found that the appellant&#039;s contradictory claims regarding turnover and failure to provide sufficient evidence led to the confirmation of the penalty. The Court determined that the Tribunal&#039;s decision had no legal error, dismissed the appeal, and made no order as to costs, closing any pending miscellaneous applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 735 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430311</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act for non-compliance with Section 44AB. The Court found that the appellant&#039;s contradictory claims regarding turnover and failure to provide sufficient evidence led to the confirmation of the penalty. The Court determined that the Tribunal&#039;s decision had no legal error, dismissed the appeal, and made no order as to costs, closing any pending miscellaneous applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>