<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 720 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430296</link>
    <description>The Special Bench held in favor of the assessee, ruling that deductions under section 36(1)(viia) should include total outstanding advances, including opening balances. This decision aligned with the Calcutta and Madras High Courts&#039; rulings. The case was remanded to the Division Bench for further proceedings on other pending issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:58:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 720 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430296</link>
      <description>The Special Bench held in favor of the assessee, ruling that deductions under section 36(1)(viia) should include total outstanding advances, including opening balances. This decision aligned with the Calcutta and Madras High Courts&#039; rulings. The case was remanded to the Division Bench for further proceedings on other pending issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>