<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 718 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430294</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) could not add interest income received on an income tax refund as it was not part of the reasons for reopening the assessment. The addition made by the AO was deemed invalid, and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was overturned, leading to the appeal of the assessee being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 718 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430294</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) could not add interest income received on an income tax refund as it was not part of the reasons for reopening the assessment. The addition made by the AO was deemed invalid, and the CIT(A)&#039;s decision was overturned, leading to the appeal of the assessee being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>