<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 46 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the appellant, modifying the impugned order. Penalties under sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act were set aside, and the penalty under section 78 was reduced. The excess amount paid by the appellant was to be adjusted against the dues, based on the appellant&#039;s prompt payment of tax liability and a friendly tax compliance scheme. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) had not adequately considered the appellant&#039;s arguments, ultimately leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 46 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the appellant, modifying the impugned order. Penalties under sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act were set aside, and the penalty under section 78 was reduced. The excess amount paid by the appellant was to be adjusted against the dues, based on the appellant&#039;s prompt payment of tax liability and a friendly tax compliance scheme. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) had not adequately considered the appellant&#039;s arguments, ultimately leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>