<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 709 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430285</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court, in a judgment by K.R. Shriram &amp;amp; A. S. Doctor, JJ., addressed delays in adjudicating a show cause notice, failure to inform the party about transfer to call book, violation of natural justice principles, and the finality of an order in a related case. The court criticized the respondent for unjustified delays and lack of communication, emphasizing timely adjudication and procedural fairness. Consequently, the court quashed the show cause notice dated 19th October, 2012, and directed the department to refund certain investigation-related amounts, citing the futility of adjudication due to the finality of the order in the related case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:58:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 709 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430285</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court, in a judgment by K.R. Shriram &amp;amp; A. S. Doctor, JJ., addressed delays in adjudicating a show cause notice, failure to inform the party about transfer to call book, violation of natural justice principles, and the finality of an order in a related case. The court criticized the respondent for unjustified delays and lack of communication, emphasizing timely adjudication and procedural fairness. Consequently, the court quashed the show cause notice dated 19th October, 2012, and directed the department to refund certain investigation-related amounts, citing the futility of adjudication due to the finality of the order in the related case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>