https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430282 The appeal challenged the order confirming a demand of differential duty for imported 'fire sprinklers' classified under Customs Tariff Heading 84249000. The dispute revolved around the correct application of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) rate under specific entries in the notification. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision, supporting a lower IGST rate application based on the interpretation of relevant entries, was upheld, affirming that the order did not suffer from any illegality. en-us Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430282 The appeal challenged the order confirming a demand of differential duty for imported 'fire sprinklers' classified under Customs Tariff Heading 84249000. The dispute revolved around the correct application of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) rate under specific entries in the notification. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision, supporting a lower IGST rate application based on the interpretation of relevant entries, was upheld, affirming that the order did not suffer from any illegality. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430282