<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 699 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430275</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) was not liable to pay for live bank guarantees invoked before the &quot;Transfer Date&quot; as per the Resolution Plan terms. The Resolution Plan specified that payment for invoked bank guarantees would only apply post &quot;Transfer Date.&quot; The tribunal emphasized adherence to the Resolution Plan terms and defined dates. Citing relevant legal precedents, the tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling the SRA was not obligated to pay the pre-&quot;Transfer Date&quot; invoked guarantees, stating surprise claims not in the Plan were not enforceable against the SRA. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 699 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430275</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) was not liable to pay for live bank guarantees invoked before the &quot;Transfer Date&quot; as per the Resolution Plan terms. The Resolution Plan specified that payment for invoked bank guarantees would only apply post &quot;Transfer Date.&quot; The tribunal emphasized adherence to the Resolution Plan terms and defined dates. Citing relevant legal precedents, the tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling the SRA was not obligated to pay the pre-&quot;Transfer Date&quot; invoked guarantees, stating surprise claims not in the Plan were not enforceable against the SRA. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>