https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430269 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on 11.11.2022, as there was no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The appellant was found not entitled to credit due to inconsistencies in the debit note, lack of evidence of services rendered, and failure to meet the requirements of Rule 9 of the CCR, 2004. The Tribunal concluded that there was a violation of Rule 9, making the credit ineligible, and the appellant's claim for refund was rejected based on the ineligibility of the debit note under the mentioned rule. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2022 22:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430269 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on 11.11.2022, as there was no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The appellant was found not entitled to credit due to inconsistencies in the debit note, lack of evidence of services rendered, and failure to meet the requirements of Rule 9 of the CCR, 2004. The Tribunal concluded that there was a violation of Rule 9, making the credit ineligible, and the appellant's claim for refund was rejected based on the ineligibility of the debit note under the mentioned rule. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430269