<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 687 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430263</link>
    <description>Concessional inter-State tax on sales of dals and pulses was held unavailable without furnishing C-Forms as required under section 8(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act read with the relevant rules; in the absence of a valid Government exemption, the higher rate under section 8(2) applied. The earlier relaxation was stated to have operated only up to 31.03.2015, and pending representations did not create a right to waiver or legitimate expectation in a taxing context. The writ challenge was also held not maintainable because an effective statutory appeal lay against the assessment orders, and no exception justifying bypass of that remedy was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:56:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 687 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430263</link>
      <description>Concessional inter-State tax on sales of dals and pulses was held unavailable without furnishing C-Forms as required under section 8(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act read with the relevant rules; in the absence of a valid Government exemption, the higher rate under section 8(2) applied. The earlier relaxation was stated to have operated only up to 31.03.2015, and pending representations did not create a right to waiver or legitimate expectation in a taxing context. The writ challenge was also held not maintainable because an effective statutory appeal lay against the assessment orders, and no exception justifying bypass of that remedy was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>