https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430259 A revisional application under Section 482 CrPC filed through a constituted attorney was held maintainable because the applicable Appellate Side Rules allowed an application to be signed and dated by the applicant, declarant or advocate, and no contrary rule of the Court displaced that position. The challenge to the FIR and criminal proceeding also failed because the complaint disclosed materials indicating a cognizable offence; the Court held that investigation was necessary, FIR registration was mandatory once such offence was disclosed, and the truth or probability of the allegations could not be tested at the quashing stage. Inherent powers were therefore not exercised, and the proceeding was allowed to continue. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430259 A revisional application under Section 482 CrPC filed through a constituted attorney was held maintainable because the applicable Appellate Side Rules allowed an application to be signed and dated by the applicant, declarant or advocate, and no contrary rule of the Court displaced that position. The challenge to the FIR and criminal proceeding also failed because the complaint disclosed materials indicating a cognizable offence; the Court held that investigation was necessary, FIR registration was mandatory once such offence was disclosed, and the truth or probability of the allegations could not be tested at the quashing stage. Inherent powers were therefore not exercised, and the proceeding was allowed to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430259