https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305092 For limitation under Section 34(3), a signed arbitral award must be delivered to and received by the party himself; receipt by counsel does not start time, so the Section 34 petition was within time. The Court also held that the petitioner was bound by the arbitration agreement arising from the association's articles and the underlying business arrangement, rejected the claim of non-service where repeated arbitral notices and legal representation were shown, and found that the award did not travel beyond the statement of claim. The arbitral award was sustained and the petition failed on all substantive grounds. en-us Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:46:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305092 For limitation under Section 34(3), a signed arbitral award must be delivered to and received by the party himself; receipt by counsel does not start time, so the Section 34 petition was within time. The Court also held that the petitioner was bound by the arbitration agreement arising from the association's articles and the underlying business arrangement, rejected the claim of non-service where repeated arbitral notices and legal representation were shown, and found that the award did not travel beyond the statement of claim. The arbitral award was sustained and the petition failed on all substantive grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305092