<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1740 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305093</link>
    <description>The court allowed the Criminal Petition, quashing all further proceedings in C.C.No.109 of 2007. It was concluded that continuing the prosecution would cause unnecessary harassment to the petitioner, as the additional tax demand was paid, and there was no evidence of willful tax evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:46:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1740 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305093</link>
      <description>The court allowed the Criminal Petition, quashing all further proceedings in C.C.No.109 of 2007. It was concluded that continuing the prosecution would cause unnecessary harassment to the petitioner, as the additional tax demand was paid, and there was no evidence of willful tax evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>