https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305088 In an NDPS case, the Supreme Court granted bail after considering that the accused had spent about 1 year and 7 months in custody, the trial had barely commenced with only one witness examined, and there were no criminal antecedents. The Court expressly declined to comment on the merits and treated the custody period and early trial stage as sufficient grounds to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. en-us Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:50:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305088 In an NDPS case, the Supreme Court granted bail after considering that the accused had spent about 1 year and 7 months in custody, the trial had barely commenced with only one witness examined, and there were no criminal antecedents. The Court expressly declined to comment on the merits and treated the custody period and early trial stage as sufficient grounds to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305088