<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 322 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30934</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore directed the appellant to pre-deposit Rs. 10,00,000 within four months, failing which the appeal would be dismissed. Upon compliance, the balance of duty and penalties would be waived, and recovery stayed until appeal disposal. The appellant&#039;s arguments for deductions on non-taxable activities were not accepted, and their financial hardship plea was partially considered, leading to the specified pre-deposit amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 322 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30934</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore directed the appellant to pre-deposit Rs. 10,00,000 within four months, failing which the appeal would be dismissed. Upon compliance, the balance of duty and penalties would be waived, and recovery stayed until appeal disposal. The appellant&#039;s arguments for deductions on non-taxable activities were not accepted, and their financial hardship plea was partially considered, leading to the specified pre-deposit amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>