<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Extended Limitation Period Not Applicable: No Evidence of Fact Suppression or Intent to Evade Service Tax by Subcontractor.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66553</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation - suppression of facts or not - it is not only the larger bench decision which settled the law law but there were contrary circulars of the board on the issue of payment of service tax by the sub-contractor. In view of this position, there is no suppression of fact or any mala fide intention to evade payment of service tax on the part of appellant - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:44:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:44:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Extended Limitation Period Not Applicable: No Evidence of Fact Suppression or Intent to Evade Service Tax by Subcontractor.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66553</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation - suppression of facts or not - it is not only the larger bench decision which settled the law law but there were contrary circulars of the board on the issue of payment of service tax by the sub-contractor. In view of this position, there is no suppression of fact or any mala fide intention to evade payment of service tax on the part of appellant - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:44:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>