https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305077 A demand notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was held valid even though it was issued by counsel on the instructions of the payee's power of attorney holder, because the Act prescribes no special form and agency does not vitiate the notice. A complaint under Section 142 was also held maintainable where notice and complaint were prepared through counsel on such instructions, since agency is recognised and the personal-knowledge objection was treated as a matter for evidence at trial, not a ground for quashing under Section 482 CrPC. The cheque dishonour proceedings were therefore allowed to continue. en-us Wed, 01 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:03:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305077 A demand notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was held valid even though it was issued by counsel on the instructions of the payee's power of attorney holder, because the Act prescribes no special form and agency does not vitiate the notice. A complaint under Section 142 was also held maintainable where notice and complaint were prepared through counsel on such instructions, since agency is recognised and the personal-knowledge objection was treated as a matter for evidence at trial, not a ground for quashing under Section 482 CrPC. The cheque dishonour proceedings were therefore allowed to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305077