<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 679 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430255</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s appeal challenging GST registration cancellation. Despite delay caused by auditor&#039;s demise and non-receipt of show cause notice, court exercised jurisdiction under Article 226 to condone delay. Court directed restoration of GST registration upon payment of outstanding dues, accepting petitioner&#039;s bonafide reasons for delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 679 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430255</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s appeal challenging GST registration cancellation. Despite delay caused by auditor&#039;s demise and non-receipt of show cause notice, court exercised jurisdiction under Article 226 to condone delay. Court directed restoration of GST registration upon payment of outstanding dues, accepting petitioner&#039;s bonafide reasons for delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>