<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 676 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430252</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Appellate Authority to decide the pending appeal within two months, preferably by 15.11.2022, instead of granting substantive interim relief. It recorded that the petitioner may raise all contentions in the appeal and expressly stated that no opinion was expressed on the merits. The disputes concerning detention, valuation, confiscation, and the auction of confiscated goods were left for fresh adjudication by the Appellate Authority in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 676 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430252</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Appellate Authority to decide the pending appeal within two months, preferably by 15.11.2022, instead of granting substantive interim relief. It recorded that the petitioner may raise all contentions in the appeal and expressly stated that no opinion was expressed on the merits. The disputes concerning detention, valuation, confiscation, and the auction of confiscated goods were left for fresh adjudication by the Appellate Authority in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>