<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 675 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430251</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the petition challenging a tax confiscation order, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal under section 107 of Central GST Act. The court extended interim relief while emphasizing procedural compliance and requiring maintenance of bank guarantee during appeal process. Statutory appeal was deemed the appropriate remedy, precluding direct writ jurisdiction intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 675 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430251</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the petition challenging a tax confiscation order, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal under section 107 of Central GST Act. The court extended interim relief while emphasizing procedural compliance and requiring maintenance of bank guarantee during appeal process. Statutory appeal was deemed the appropriate remedy, precluding direct writ jurisdiction intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>