https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430242 The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the AO to delete additions related to Section 40A(3) payments exceeding Rs. 20,000, discrepancies in closing balances of sundry creditors, and rental expenses discrepancy of Rs. 35,000. The appeal was partly allowed, with the architect fee addition of Rs. 20,000 being dismissed due to its small amount. en-us Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2022 22:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430242 The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the AO to delete additions related to Section 40A(3) payments exceeding Rs. 20,000, discrepancies in closing balances of sundry creditors, and rental expenses discrepancy of Rs. 35,000. The appeal was partly allowed, with the architect fee addition of Rs. 20,000 being dismissed due to its small amount. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430242