<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 655 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430231</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment of Long Term Capital Gain as Short Term Capital Gain. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s decision unfounded, considering the documentary evidence provided by the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the Long Term Capital Gain on the sale of shares was exempt under section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:16:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 655 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430231</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment of Long Term Capital Gain as Short Term Capital Gain. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s decision unfounded, considering the documentary evidence provided by the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the Long Term Capital Gain on the sale of shares was exempt under section 10(38) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>