https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430229 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs.155,000 as undisclosed income. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing supporting documentation to substantiate claims and considered the appellant's explanation regarding the source of the cash deposit during demonetization as valid. The Tribunal did not address the validity of the assessment order based on the revised return explicitly but focused on the addition of cash deposit. en-us Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:16:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430229 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs.155,000 as undisclosed income. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing supporting documentation to substantiate claims and considered the appellant's explanation regarding the source of the cash deposit during demonetization as valid. The Tribunal did not address the validity of the assessment order based on the revised return explicitly but focused on the addition of cash deposit. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430229