<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 648 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, citing non-maintainability. It emphasized that dissenting homebuyers must abide by the majority decision, finding the resolution plan compliant with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions. The appeal was disposed of without costs, as there were no substantial grounds to interfere with the approved resolution plan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 21:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 648 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, citing non-maintainability. It emphasized that dissenting homebuyers must abide by the majority decision, finding the resolution plan compliant with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions. The appeal was disposed of without costs, as there were no substantial grounds to interfere with the approved resolution plan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>