https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305072 The appellate court upheld the decision that the Delhi High Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to hear the case regarding trademark infringement of "AMRAPALI." The suit was initially dismissed, but the appellate court directed the plaintiff to file the case in Deogarh, Jharkhand, where the cause of action arose. The dismissal was overturned, and the parties were instructed to bear their own costs. en-us Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:15:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305072 The appellate court upheld the decision that the Delhi High Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to hear the case regarding trademark infringement of "AMRAPALI." The suit was initially dismissed, but the appellate court directed the plaintiff to file the case in Deogarh, Jharkhand, where the cause of action arose. The dismissal was overturned, and the parties were instructed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305072