<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 640 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430216</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision to reject the appellants&#039; request for waiver under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellants failed to satisfy the conditions for waiver, as they did not demonstrate genuine hardship, default beyond their control, and cooperation in inquiries. The Court noted that the tax demand arose from admitted income, and since the tax and interest were paid belatedly, the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:15:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=695786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 640 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430216</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision to reject the appellants&#039; request for waiver under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellants failed to satisfy the conditions for waiver, as they did not demonstrate genuine hardship, default beyond their control, and cooperation in inquiries. The Court noted that the tax demand arose from admitted income, and since the tax and interest were paid belatedly, the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>