https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430214 The court quashed the order canceling the land allotment in the SEZ due to the petitioner's failure to commence production within the stipulated time. The court directed reconsideration of the petitioner's de-notification request, finding it feasible without significant prejudice to others in the SEZ. The petitioner's genuine difficulties were considered, leading to a directive for re-examination by the first respondent within six months, with steps taken under the Tamil Nadu Public Premises Act, 1975, being quashed. en-us Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430214 The court quashed the order canceling the land allotment in the SEZ due to the petitioner's failure to commence production within the stipulated time. The court directed reconsideration of the petitioner's de-notification request, finding it feasible without significant prejudice to others in the SEZ. The petitioner's genuine difficulties were considered, leading to a directive for re-examination by the first respondent within six months, with steps taken under the Tamil Nadu Public Premises Act, 1975, being quashed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430214